Supporting research

Assess alternatives. Keep the school open.

What could keep the school open?

The council should assess realistic alternatives before choosing closure. These need a willing operator, a lawful route and a recurring budget; none is yet established as viable. Current findings · Questions to ask.

What would an alternative need?

Compare smaller-school, shared-leadership and recovery arrangements on the same terms: a costed class and support plan, credible pupil assumptions and clear partner commitments. Read the current findings and the tests for each option.

Ways to assess an alternative.

Explore the evidence, practical requirements and limits of each approach.

A costed alternative to closureA realistic budget and a willing delivery partner give the council an alternative it can assess.

The plan may change how the school is run. Agreed partners and recurring funding still need demonstrating here.

Full explanation and sources

A credible alternative gives decision-makers a choice they could put into practice. Model a smaller intake, shared leadership, a federation or suitable use of spare space, with a realistic plan for staff and funding.

Rules in force from 1 September 2026 replace the leaflet’s claim that amalgamation requires a new free school. Current guidance describes altering a surviving maintained school or, subject to conditions, creating a replacement maintained school. A legal route does not supply a willing partner, funding or suitable premises. Council leaflet · Prescribed alterations guidance · Opening new schools guidance.

What a full assessment needs

Compare three-year budgets with low, central and high pupil numbers and actual class and staffing costs. Allow for any delay before pupil changes affect income. School, governor and council agreement would be needed; none is approved here.

Test the alternatives on the same terms

  • Shared leadership or federation: the FAQ’s £50,000–£80,000 savings range alone leaves £132,417–£162,417 against the first-year gap. This is subtraction, not a committed saving; check whether savings are already assumed.
  • A smaller intake or different site use: cost actual cohorts, classes, curriculum and support. Lettings need permissions and net income after extra costs; spare space alone does not balance the budget.
  • Amalgamation or a different organisation running the school: name the willing partners and legal route; cost staffing and set-up, and check which teaching and site would remain.
  • A limited recovery period: agree funding, a spending limit, review dates and what happens if pupil numbers or savings fall short. Waiting until a PFI end date is not a free or agreed solution.

One-off fundraising does not meet recurring costs. Recruitment remains school-owned and completely separate from this closure campaign.

Sources: Kew FAQ Q5 and shared-leadership range, Q11. Current legal guidance and remaining evidence.

Limits and unanswered questions

Keeping teaching on site may change the school’s identity or how it is run. The existing-school and replacement-school routes have different procedures; September 2026 guidance also has transitional rules for earlier proposals. Agree which outcome matters and check premises/PFI permissions, timing and costs.

Closing maintained schools: statutory guidance · School financial information · The school's private finance initiative arrangement

Funding a recovery planMoney raised locally could help fund a costed recovery plan to keep the school open. No donations are being collected yet.

Exploratory only. No donations or pledges are collected, and no recipient is agreed. There is no school, PTA or council endorsement.

A one-off donation cannot resolve an ongoing shortfall or guarantee the school stays open.

Full explanation and sources

The council projects an accumulated budget deficit of over £400,000 by 2028/29. That is a forecast, not an agreed fundraising target. We need to understand the annual funding gap, what would make the school sustainable afterwards, and whether a funded alternative would change the proposal.

Source: Council consultation, “Financial strain” and the consultation leaflet, rechecked 21 September 2026.

An option to explore. No donations or pledges are collected here, and no recipient is agreed. This is Yann’s parent-led initiative; no school, PTA or council endorsement is implied.

Could local residents, families and businesses help fund a viable future for Kew Riverside Primary School? Money raised locally could help fund a costed recovery plan and give the school time to make changes.

What a full assessment needs

Work out the funding needed for an agreed recovery period. Find an organisation able to receive and manage the money. Ask the school and council for a written assessment of how a funded plan would affect the proposal. Check how interested donors are before deciding whether to launch a public appeal.

Limits and unanswered questions

A one-off donation does not fix a shortfall that continues each year. Fundraising would need a credible plan for pupil demand, costs and future income. Local wealth does not mean donors have committed. Raising money would not by itself secure a decision to keep the school open.

This sits beside the costed recovery plan because the two are connected. Its position does not mean it is likely to succeed.

Council consultation · Consultation leaflet · School financial information

Have a question about funding?

You can explore or answer just one.

Funding ideas go privately to Yann, not the council. Leave out payment details and donors’ private details.

  1. What funding would actually be needed, and for how long?

    Public budgets, an explanation of annual versus accumulated deficits, or financial modelling experience.

    Submit feedback
  2. Would a funded recovery plan change the council’s proposal?

    Published decision criteria or statements could help. This needs an answer from the school and council; visitor opinion alone cannot settle it.

    Submit feedback
  3. How could the school become sustainable after the initial funding?

    Costed ideas for shared leadership, use of space, income or realistic pupil recruitment, with assumptions and drawbacks.

    Submit feedback
  4. Who could receive and manage the money?

    Relevant experience with a school, PTA or suitable charity. No organisation has been agreed as a recipient.

    Submit feedback
  5. How could a campaign reach beyond current parents?

    Inclusive outreach, public grants, business partnerships or examples of matched giving. Please leave out donor names and private contact details.

    Submit feedback
  6. Are there comparable school rescue campaigns to learn from?

    Public links, amounts raised, what happened to the school in the end and lessons about sustainability.

    Submit feedback
  7. What would make a future appeal credible?

    Financial reporting, milestones, surplus funds and what should happen if a target is missed or closure proceeds.

    Submit feedback
  8. What expertise could help assess or organise this?

    Your own budgeting, fundraising or administration experience. An offer of help does not commit you.

    Submit feedback

Sending an idea is not a financial pledge or an official consultation response. Suggest one funding question.

Check the pupil-number forecastTest the assumptions about how many children would attend Kew.

An earlier forecast does not prove a later one wrong. Planned homes do not automatically mean pupils at Kew.

Full explanation and sources

Falling borough demand matters, but borough totals cannot settle the case for one school. An earlier Kew planning-area forecast was close to the 2025/26 total; later forecasts changed. See the matched forecast check, then ask which cohort and housing assumptions changed.

What a full assessment needs

Test each published school and Kew-area forecast against actuals for the same period and geography. Compare versions and explain changed pupil yields, housing completion dates and credible delivery scenarios. A planning permission is not an occupied family home.

School Place Planning Strategy: the Kew area · School place planning annual update: October 2025 data

Check what closing would really saveCompare costs that would stop, continue or arise if teaching moves elsewhere.

An ongoing building contract does not prove that closure saves nothing. The terms and full costs need checking.

Full explanation and sources

PFI means private finance initiative: a long-term arrangement to finance and maintain the school buildings.

The useful comparison is the avoidable cost of keeping the school open against the full cost of closing it. Continuing building payments could change the balance. See what the published costs do and do not establish.

What a full assessment needs

Ask for a year-by-year cash-flow comparison. Include PFI obligations, transition costs, redundancy, transport and any income from using the site. Separate costs that end from costs that continue.

The school's private finance initiative arrangement · Council responsibilities for school buildings · School financial information

Show what a move would mean for childrenSchool places alone do not explain support, travel or disruption for each child.

This evidence may improve a move without preventing closure. Leave out children’s names and identifying details.

Full explanation and sources

Decision-makers need practical evidence about each year group, extra support, safe journeys, accessibility, continuity and siblings. The borough equality assessment promises school-specific work, but we did not find a Kew assessment in the public pack we reviewed. See the remaining questions. A total of empty places does not answer every family’s questions.

What a full assessment needs

Ask for staffed capacity by year group, the Kew-specific equality assessment and the support planned for special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Also ask for a travel assessment and funded support for any move. Send anonymised, specific examples, with realistic ways to reduce the impact, and alternatives.

Closing maintained schools: statutory guidance · School place planning annual update: October 2025 data

Flag a possible legal problemA specialist can assess a specific concern about the process or legal duties.

Disagreement alone is not a legal defect. Parents have no general right of direct appeal to the adjudicator. This page is not legal advice.

Full explanation and sources

A specialist may charge for advice.

An education or public-law solicitor can assess a specific concern about the process, evidence or legal duties. They can do this once the relevant documents are available.

What a full assessment needs

Share the notice, consultation papers, decision report and an exact timeline. Ask quickly about the deadlines and remedies that apply.

Closing maintained schools: statutory guidance

Evidence and method

Find a source

Why these options? How to read the evidence

This order shows this site’s editorial priorities, not the chances of success. These are assessments to explore, not a ranking of success probabilities.

The council has published reasons for not preferring the alternatives it considered ↗︎; a costed comparison is still sought. Priority reflects relevance to a closure decision, how strong the argument would be with evidence, and what can be done before a decision. Crowdfunding follows the recovery plan because they are connected; its position does not show it would work.

Keeping teaching at Kew could mean changing the institution or how it is governed. Pupil-demand assumptions and funding need to fit the recovery budget.

Check the pupil forecast · Explore funding questions · What a costed plan needs

Terms used in the detail

Maintained school
A school funded through the local authority.
Federation
Schools that share a governing body but stay separate schools.
SEND
Special educational needs and disabilities.
Pre-statutory consultation
The initial consultation before any formal statutory closure proposal.
Representation period
A later period for comments or objections if a formal proposal is published.