Community letters

Your voice, in your words

Community letters

Community letters on an independent campaign website. For journalists.

Letters here are separate from your official council response. Stated deadline: 16 October 2026. Check the current process.

Write a letter Read the latest letters

Community letters

Latest letters

Write a letter

Written and video letters are personal opinions, newest first. All viewpoints are welcome. AI screened or Human reviewed labels describe assessment; names and identities are not verified. This is not a representative survey, petition or count of official responses.

Loading community letters…

Supporting notes and sources for Yann Stoneman’s 21 October letter

This note supports Yann’s letter asking for a supported recovery programme; it is not a separate community contribution.

Supporting funding note

The DfE’s July 2026 allocation figures, after academy recoupment and other deductions, show Richmond’s Dedicated Schools Grant allocation £6.28 million higher for 2026/27 than for 2025/26, including £1.94 million more in the schools block. DfE allocation statements for Richmond.

These are nominal comparisons. Separate grants have been incorporated into 2026/27 funding, so the figures do not establish a like-for-like increase or money freely available to Kew. DfE guidance on incorporated grants.

Separately, the council’s budget book describes a projected reduction of approximately 58% in core government funding by 2028/29. These figures concern different funding streams and periods. The question is how those pressures affect Kew specifically, and what support for recovery has been considered. Council budget book, page 7 (PDF).

Capacity and recovery details

At 30 pupils per class, the current four-class teaching model gives a ceiling of 120. The 84 pupils cited in the meeting represent 70% of that figure, compared with 40% against 210 published places. The council’s 140 temporary admission-based places are a third, distinct measure. These comparisons do not establish available admissions places or financial viability. The request is for the council to explain its measures and the pupil numbers needed to sustain the actual staffing structure.

The recovery assessment requested in the letter should consider proposed savings, recurring income, appropriate use of spare space and realistic pupil assumptions together, with practical support for implementation and a Kew-specific assessment of equality, SEND and wider pupil impacts.

Sources for the letter

The meeting account and personal reaction are Yann’s account of the 21 October 2026 meeting. The recovery programme and additional year are his requests, not agreed council commitments.

Letter guidelines and publication review
More about the official process

Check the official process

This is Yann Stoneman’s collection of community contributions. It is separate from the council’s consultation. A letter here is not automatically sent to or accepted by the council. The initial official response form states a deadline of 16 October 2026. Before you respond, check the current stage and written routes.

As checked on 23 September 2026, the official form asks your connection to the school, your view and your reasons, and offers space for alternatives and comments. It does not ask for a name or postcode. The optional private details above only give context if you separately agree to include your letter in the collection for the council. Read the council’s dates and documents.

A letter is not a petition signature: sign the petition separately. Have a school source or an idea? Share evidence, or send an idea or website feedback.